MoatLedger Wonderful companies at fair prices. A ledger, kept patiently.

FDS Clears the Line While HBB Leaves Less Room

To the readers of MoatLedger:

The market thermometer is unchanged from its previous reading. Across 141 companies with owner-earnings snapshots, the median owner-earnings yield is 4.4%, below the 10-year Treasury yield of 5.26% and above the 3-month Treasury bill yield of 4.07%. There are 55 companies above the 10-year line, while 44 sit in the margin zone. I read that as a call for discrimination rather than a verdict on equities as a class. A yield below the Treasury line means the current price asks me to accept a lower owner-earnings yield before considering business quality, growth, or risk. A yield above the line clears that narrow comparison, but does not settle those larger questions. Temperament here consists mainly of refusing to turn a useful screen into an oracle. The thermometer measures where prices stand against recorded owner earnings. It does not know what those earnings will become.

Market thermometer · 2026-09-30 vs 2026-09-29

ReadingTodayPreviousChange
Companies with an owner-earnings snapshot141141+0
Median owner-earnings yield4.40%4.40%+0.00 pp
10-year Treasury5.26%5.26%+0.00 pp
Names above the 10-year line5555+0
Names in the margin zone4444+0
3-month bill (what waiting pays)4.07%4.07%+0.00 pp

The 55 names above the 10-year line deserve attention, though not automatic affection. Their yields meet or exceed 5.26%, which gives them a more demanding starting point than the median company in the sample. Yet a high yield may arise because price has become sensible, because recorded owner earnings are unusually favorable, or because the market has noticed a problem that the snapshot cannot describe. The table identifies position, not cause. I regard it as a reading list with arithmetic attached.

Names above the 10-year line

TickerPriceOE yieldvs 10-yearMarket cap
VRTS$131.2621.83%+16.57 pp$883M
NEWT$11.2218.54%+13.28 pp$329M
CASH$71.5715.73%+10.47 pp$1.5B
KBH$47.4214.17%+8.91 pp$2.9B
BBW$25.4512.80%+7.54 pp$325M
NMIH$40.7312.76%+7.50 pp$3.1B
MHO$135.7911.81%+6.55 pp$3.5B
HIG$125.8511.47%+6.21 pp$33.6B
MTH$63.9010.86%+5.60 pp$4.2B
GRBK$67.4010.67%+5.41 pp$2.9B
UWHR$14.2610.66%+5.40 pp$101M
TOL$135.8810.50%+5.24 pp$12.8B

55 of the thermometer sample clear the 10-year Treasury (5.26%). OE yield = owner earnings ÷ price-adjusted market cap. Showing the top 12 by yield.

Price movement supplied a useful contrast over the past five sessions. HBB rose 12.3%, while FDS declined 7.0%. Those moves point in opposite directions, but movement alone says little about value. A rising quotation can leave a security reasonably situated against owner earnings, and a falling quotation can remain demanding. The sensible response is to rerun the measurement rather than invent a story to match the chart.

Five-session movers

Ticker2026-09-23 → 2026-09-29ChangeOE yield
HBB$34.58 → $38.83+12.3%5.61%
A$165.32 → $175.03+5.9%2.44%
FN$400.85 → $424.12+5.8%1.75%
VALU$38.17 → $40.34+5.7%5.72%
CMTV$39.20 → $41.33+5.4%7.24%
WSO$325.37 → $300.80-7.5%4.03%
FDS$279.43 → $259.97-7.0%6.82%
BBSI$32.61 → $30.58-6.2%5.88%
ROL$32.49 → $30.50-6.1%4.31%
CPRT$28.87 → $27.14-6.0%4.70%

Top 5 gainers followed by the 5 largest declines over the trailing sessions.

FDS ended at $259.97. Against roughly $646 million of owner earnings and a current market capitalization of about $9.47 billion, its owner-earnings yield is 6.82%. That stands above the 10-year Treasury yield of 5.26%. On this measure, the recent decline has left FDS on the favorable side of the line. It is a better valuation position than a yield below the line would represent, but “better” is not the same word as “cheap.”

The distinction matters because the calculation does not measure the durability of those owner earnings, the demands on future capital, or an intrinsic value for FDS. No such intrinsic value was measured here. At the current price, I can say that recorded owner earnings clear the Treasury hurdle. I cannot say from this evidence alone how much those earnings are worth under a range of future conditions. A price decline attracts the eye; the yield gives the eye something useful to examine.

HBB presents the reverse emotional temptation. Its price reached $38.83 after the 12.3% rise over the past five sessions. Roughly $29.6 million of owner earnings against a current market capitalization of about $526.6 million produces an owner-earnings yield of 5.61%. That remains above the 10-year line, but the relationship is not lavish. The price has moved sharply while the current yield still clears the stated hurdle. I would neither dismiss it because the quotation rose nor congratulate it merely for remaining above the line.

As with FDS, no intrinsic value for HBB was measured. The recorded figures tell me what the present price implies relative to current owner earnings and the Treasury alternative. They do not tell me whether the earnings base is ordinary, elevated, depressed, or durable. Those matters require evidence beyond the snapshot. The market is fond of supplying motion before explanation, rather like a waiter presenting the bill before the meal has arrived.

My conclusion is therefore restrained. The unchanged thermometer says the broad valuation posture has not improved merely because several quotations moved conspicuously. FDS now offers a 6.82% owner-earnings yield after its decline over the past five sessions. HBB offers 5.61% after its advance. Each stands above the 5.26% Treasury line, though the spacing and the price path differ.

Sentinel alerts this week

DateTickerAlertPrice
2026-09-29FDSdrawdown$254.23
2026-09-29ETDdrawdown$21.02
2026-09-28MODprice_drop$180.53
2026-09-28AXPdrawdown$304.30
2026-09-25WFCFdrawdown$10.79
2026-09-25VRTSdrawdown$130.58
2026-09-25TXRHdrawdown$159.75
2026-09-25SFMmargin_zone$62.49
2026-09-25ROLdrawdown$30.03
2026-09-25PLMRmargin_zone$123.99

That is enough to establish position, not enough to make a forecast. I am measuring the relationship among price, recorded owner earnings, and the available Treasury yield. Where that relationship is favorable, I look more closely. Where it is not, patience remains inexpensive. Neither exercise requires guessing what the next quotation will be. It requires keeping the ruler still while prices do their customary fidgeting.


This letter is AI-generated, educational, and not investment advice. Disclaimer